Has anyone else tried out LibreWolf as an alternative to Firefox?

It is billed as a more secure version of FF and is based off of the most
recent code. I read a brief review about it and decided to try it out.

The review was mostly about the security features... how a lot of options
that are not automatically defaulted to ON in FF are in LW.

I mention that because I found that LW had some issues. I have a lot of bookmarks in FF. LW offered to import bookmarks from a previous browser
but was only able to find chromium, which I have installed but only use on sites that don't work with FF. I thought that was odd that a FF derivative didn't know where to find the FF info on a debian box.

So then I tried the "import from HTML file" option. That did not work at
all, and LW provided no error message as to why it was not able to import
the file... it was able to open it as a page so it was there and was HTML.

I opened a private window and went to a couple of sites that require a
logon. LW didn't behave as I would expect there, either... this could be a settings issue, though, but it didn't even ask if I wanted the password
saved or not. It seemed completely unaware that I was logging into the websites.

I might try it out again sometime but, for now, it has been apt removed.

Mike


* SLMR 2.1a * Wasting time is an important part of life.
---
þ Synchronet þ CAPCITY2 * Capitol City Online

Hey Dumas!

On Wed, 07 Jan 2026 11:03:50 -0500, you wrote:

Has anyone else tried out LibreWolf as an alternative to Firefox?

Never heard of it, but I looked it up and the first screenshot I saw looked /exactly/ like Firefox.

I think I'll just enable/disable what I want in the original product, and use add-ons that work.

It is billed as a more secure version of FF and is based off of the most recent code. I read a brief review about it and decided to try it out.

I wonder, how it is more secure? Do they just include the popular security add-ons that are available for Firefox in their version? I use uBlock Origin here with my Firefox, and there's really nothing that disappoints me about it. Heck, I haven't even run into any sites that don't work in quite some time.

I might try it out again sometime but, for now, it has been apt removed.

I'll pass, but thank you for the forewarning and heads up. I pulled up the site to check it out, finished reading your post, and closed the window without reading anything. ;)

Regards,
Nick

... Sarcasm: because beating people up is illegal.
--- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5-b20250409
* Origin: _thePharcyde telnet://bbs.pharcyde.org (Wisconsin) (723:1/1)
ï¿­ Synchronet ï¿­ _thePharcyde telnet://bbs.pharcyde.org (Wisconsin)

Re: LibreWolf ?
By: Dumas Walker to ALL on Wed Jan 07 2026 11:03 am

Has anyone else tried out LibreWolf
an alternative to Firefox?

Yeah, I use this browser. Not really
for any particular reason other than I
needed a separate browser from my
regular FireFox and I didn't what
Chromium. It is basically FireFox with
a whole bunch of things either enabled
or disabled for the paranoid. For
instance, it will always tell websites
that you are UTC, and not your local
timezone. It will by default not ask to
save passwords or anything like that.
For me, it puts all the regular
settings exactly like I do, but then it
does a few more in the secret/advanced
settings for the extra-paranoid. Also I
believe it comes with uBlock Origin
pre-installed.

If you're me, and you don't feel like
going through all the Firefox settings,
then use LibreWolf.

---
þ Synchronet þ TIRED of waiting 2 hours for a taco? GO TO TACOPRONTO.bbs.io

Re: LibreWolf ?
By: Dumas Walker to ALL on Wed Jan 07 2026 11:03 am

Has anyone else tried out LibreWolf as an alternative to
Firefox?

It is billed as a more secure version of FF and is based off of the
most recent code. I read a brief review about it and decided to try
it out.

The review was mostly about the security features... how a lot of
options that are not automatically defaulted to ON in FF are in LW.

i tried it. it's nothing special. go with brave.
---
þ Synchronet þ ::: BBSES.info - free BBS services :::

Re: LibreWolf ?
By: Dumas Walker to ALL on Wed Jan 07 2026 11:03 am

Has anyone else tried out LibreWolf as an alternative to Firefox?

It is billed as a more secure version of FF and is based off of the most recent code. I read a brief review about it and decided to try it out.

Since it's essentially Firefox, I found that there were no problems with moving absolutely everything over to LF if you copy your Firefox profile data over to LF. Works like a charm.

---
þ Synchronet þ We're yakking at Yak Station BBS

I might try it out again sometime but, for now, it has been apt removed.

I'll pass, but thank you for the forewarning and heads up. I pulled up the sit
to check it out, finished reading your post, and closed the window without reading anything. ;)

Sounds like a good choice. ;)


* SLMR 2.1a * Illiterate? Want to learn to read? Write for free info.
---
þ Synchronet þ CAPCITY2 * Capitol City Online

Has anyone else tried out LibreWolf as an alternative to Firefox?

It is billed as a more secure version of FF and is based off of the most recent code. I read a brief review about it and decided to try it out.

Since it's essentially Firefox, I found that there were no problems with movin
absolutely everything over to LF if you copy your Firefox profile data over to
LF. Works like a charm.

So you had to copy all of that over manually?

If you copy over all your profile data manually, aren't you also copying
over all of the FF security settings, defeating the purpose of LF's
supposedly more-secure defaults?


* SLMR 2.1a * bulldozer (n.) - political speech writer taking a nap.
---
þ Synchronet þ CAPCITY2 * Capitol City Online